The United Kingdom’s military establishment and political leaders pushed back sharply against remarks made by Vice President JD Vance regarding allied military contributions.

British veterans, active-duty personnel, and government officials expressed concern over Vance’s statements, citing the 636 British service members killed in Iraq and Afghanistan operations. The quick response underscored tensions between Washington and London over how military partnerships are discussed publicly.

Veterans and Military Leaders React

Prominent British veterans including Johnny Mercer and Andy McNab criticized Vance’s comments as disrespectful to allied forces. Retired military brass like Lord West and General Sir Patrick Sanders emphasized the long history of shared sacrifice between British and American troops.

Political Figures Weigh In

Shadow Defense Secretary James Cartlidge described Vance’s statements as “deeply disrespectful” to Britain’s military role alongside the United States. Former Foreign Secretary James Cleverly and other Members of Parliament called for recognition of the common history and joint losses between the two nations.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer reaffirmed the country’s pride in its armed forces and stressed the importance of mutual respect among close allies. “We value the special relationship with America,” Starmer said, emphasizing the need for diplomatic care.

Vance’s Response

Facing mounting criticism, Vance clarified that his remarks targeted nations without recent combat experience, not the United Kingdom or France specifically. The episode has sparked broader debate about the necessity of careful diplomatic language when discussing military contributions of longstanding partners.

This story has been updated. CNN’s International Desk contributed to this report.